In response to the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) decision to withdraw the electoral symbol ‘bat’ from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the party has decided to contest the ruling in the Peshawar High Court. Despite the ECP’s verdict on Friday night, PTI’s legal team promptly approached the high court on Saturday to file a case. PTI claims that they have not yet received the verified written order from the ECP but expressed intent to challenge the decision once received. The ECP, citing non-compliance with its directions and election laws, declared PTI ineligible to retain the ‘bat’ symbol after ruling that the party did not conduct intra-party elections in accordance with regulations. The decision, invoking Section 215 of the Election Act, 2017, has significant implications, nullifying PTI’s intra-party polls and, consequently, its new chairman, Barrister Gohar Ali Khan.
Related Posts
Consul general of Germany meets mayor Karachi to discuss bilateral cooperation.
- Ibtehaj Tahir
- October 21, 2023
- 0
In a significant diplomatic encounter, the Consul General of Germany, Dr. Rudiger Lotz, paid a visit to the Mayor of Karachi, Barrister Murtaza Wahab, at […]
American Muslim Leaders Boycott White House Iftar Dinner in Protest of US Policy on Gaza Conflict
- Usama Mudassar
- April 3, 2024
- 0
The decision to boycott the White House Iftar dinner comes amidst mounting calls from American Muslim leaders for the Biden administration to prioritize efforts towards achieving a cease-fire in Gaza. The community’s unwavering commitment to advocating for peace and justice in the region reflects a collective desire to see an end to the violence and suffering endured by Palestinians.
Chief Justice of Pakistan Limits Registrar’s Administrative Powers in Key Reforms
- Usama Mudassar
- November 10, 2023
- 0
The move also extends to the audit and administrative functions of the court. Audit and administrative matters will now require the approval of the Chief Justice for their completion. This decision ensures a higher level of oversight and accountability in the administrative processes of the Supreme Court.