Lahore High Court Bar Calls for Strike Over Civil Courts Division Issue

The Lahore High Court Bar has taken a decisive stance on the issue of the division of civil courts, issuing a strike call to protest against the contentious proposal. The decision was made during a joint general house meeting of various lawyers’ organizations held at the Lahore High Court Bar, with prominent figures such as Vice Chairman Kamran Bashir Mughal and lawyer Ahsan Bhawan in attendance. The meeting served as a platform for lawyers to voice their concerns and condemn the recent incidents of police violence.

President of the High Court Bar, Asad Manzoor Butt, announced plans for a strike not only on the day of the meeting but also on the following Friday, underscoring the resolve of the legal community to stand united in their protest against the proposed division of civil courts. Additionally, President Butt called upon the government to release the necessary funds for the functioning of the bars, highlighting the financial challenges faced by legal professionals in carrying out their duties effectively.

Vice Chairman of the Punjab Bar Council, Kamran Bashir Mughal, echoed President Butt’s sentiments, emphasizing the peaceful nature of the lawyers’ rally and urging for the withdrawal of terrorism cases filed against lawyers. Mughal’s remarks underscored the need for legal protection and the preservation of the rights of lawyers to engage in peaceful protest without fear of reprisal or persecution.

Following the conclusion of the general house meeting, lawyers took to the streets in a symbolic display of solidarity, marching from the court premises to GPO Chowk. The rally served as a visible demonstration of the legal community’s collective strength and determination to safeguard the integrity of the judiciary and uphold the rule of law.

The decision to call for a strike reflects the deep-seated concerns within the legal fraternity regarding the proposed division of civil courts, which is seen as a potential threat to the independence and efficacy of the judicial system. Lawyers argue that such a move could undermine the administration of justice and compromise the rights of litigants, warranting a unified response from the legal community.

Furthermore, the demand for the withdrawal of terrorism cases against lawyers highlights the broader issue of legal protection and the need for accountability in cases of police violence or abuse of power. The legal community’s insistence on justice and accountability underscores its commitment to upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

As the strike action unfolds, it is expected to draw attention to the grievances of the legal community and galvanize support for their cause. By mobilizing in solidarity and voicing their concerns through peaceful protest, lawyers aim to effect meaningful change and ensure the preservation of the judicial system’s integrity and independence.