The Lahore High Court (LHC) has taken a significant step in addressing concerns over freedom of expression by accepting a petition against the controversial PECA Amendment Act 2025 for a preliminary hearing. The petition, filed by the Federal Union of Journalists, challenges the legitimacy of the amendment, arguing that it was introduced without consulting relevant stakeholders and journalistic organizations.
Journalists Challenge PECA Amendment in Lahore High Court
Justice Farooq Haider presided over the admissibility hearing of the petition in the Lahore High Court. The Federal Union of Journalists filed the petition, arguing that the amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2025 directly threaten press freedom and the right to free speech, both of which are guaranteed under the Constitution of Pakistan.
According to the petitioners, the PECA Amendment Act 2025 was passed without consulting media professionals, digital rights activists, and other relevant stakeholders. The new amendments allegedly impose harsh restrictions on journalists, limit their ability to report freely, and criminalize dissenting voices on digital platforms.
How the PECA Amendment Affects Freedom of Speech
The PECA Amendment Act has faced criticism from various media organizations, human rights groups, and legal experts, who argue that the amendments violate fundamental rights. Key concerns raised by journalists and activists include:
Stricter Online Regulations – The amendment expands the definition of cybercrimes, making it easier to prosecute individuals for online speech.
Increased Government Control – The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has been given broader powers to remove content without judicial oversight.
Threat to Investigative Journalism – The law could be used to target journalists who expose corruption and misconduct, discouraging independent reporting.
Vague and Broad Language – Critics argue that the law is intentionally vague, allowing authorities to misuse it against dissenting voices and political opponents.
Recent Controversies Surrounding PECA
The PECA law has been the center of controversy, with multiple cases registered under its provisions. A recent case involved a citizen arrested for spreading fake news of a robbery on WhatsApp, raising concerns about how the government is using the law to control online narratives.
Additionally, several petitions challenging PECA have been filed in the Supreme Court, demanding a review of its provisions and its potential misuse. Legal experts warn that if left unchecked, the law could lead to widespread censorship and suppression of independent voices.
Court’s Response: A Step Toward Press Freedom?
After reviewing the petition, the Lahore High Court granted it for a preliminary hearing and issued notices to the federal government, the Election Commission, PTA, and other relevant authorities. The court’s decision marks a crucial step toward ensuring that any amendment to the PECA Act aligns with constitutional rights.
The petitioners seek to have the PECA Amendment Act 2025 declared unconstitutional and completely nullified, arguing that it directly conflicts with Article 19 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of expression and press freedom.
Legal and Public Reactions
The acceptance of this petition has sparked debates across the country, with journalists, legal experts, and civil society activists voicing their concerns over the increasing government control over digital content.
Legal experts argue that any law affecting fundamental rights should undergo rigorous debate and consultation before being enacted.
Journalists warn that the law could be used as a tool for oppression, silencing investigative reporting and suppressing political dissent.
Human rights organizations emphasize that a free press is essential for a healthy democracy, urging the judiciary to take a strong stance against censorship laws.
What’s Next? The Road Ahead
With the Lahore High Court now involved in the case, the next steps will determine whether the PECA Amendment Act 2025 will stand or be repealed. Possible outcomes include:
A full court hearing where both sides present their arguments.
A government response explaining the reasoning behind the amendments.
Potential suspension or nullification of controversial clauses.
As the case unfolds, journalists, civil rights activists, and digital rights advocates will closely monitor the proceedings, hoping for a ruling that safeguards press freedom in Pakistan.
A Crucial Moment for Press Freedom
The PECA Amendment Act 2025 has become one of the most hotly debated laws in Pakistan, with serious concerns about press freedom, censorship, and government overreach. The Lahore High Court’s decision to hear the case is a positive step toward protecting fundamental rights.
As the legal battle continues, all eyes are on the judiciary to ensure that Pakistan’s digital laws align with democratic values, free speech, and the public’s right to information. The verdict in this case could set a major precedent for media freedom and digital rights in the country.
