On August 17, 2024, the Lahore High Court (LHC) directed the federal government and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) to submit their responses regarding the ongoing internet disruptions affecting millions across the country. The court, led by Justice Shakil Ahmad, is handling a petition filed by Noman Sarwar against what is being termed a nationwide internet “shutdown.”
Justice Ahmad has reserved the verdict on this matter and scheduled the next hearing for August 21, 2024. He has instructed all parties involved to ensure their representatives are present and to provide their responses by this date. The interruptions in internet services, particularly affecting mobile data connectivity, have been a significant issue for many citizens.
The disruptions have been attributed by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s administration to the testing of a new internet firewall. This firewall is reportedly designed to control social media and filter out unwanted content, which critics argue could be a form of censorship.
The petition, which includes respondents such as the federal government, the PTA, and several key government officials, challenges the legality of the internet shutdown. It claims that authorities have not provided sufficient justification for the restrictions imposed on social media platforms and calls for the immediate restoration of full internet access.
The economic impact of these disruptions is substantial. The Chairman of the Wireless and Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan has warned that businesses reliant on online services are struggling to maintain operations, with some facing severe threats to their survival. Additionally, the Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) has expressed concerns that frequent disruptions could undermine the development of the country’s digital infrastructure, which is crucial for economic growth.
Despite these concerns, the federal government has defended its decision to implement the firewall. Minister of State for Information Technology and Telecommunication Shaza Fatima Khawaja described the measure as a necessary cybersecurity step. She emphasized that, given the rise in global and domestic cybersecurity threats, it is vital for states to enhance their capabilities to address these risks effectively.
Justice Ahmad had previously criticized the state counsel for their perceived lack of seriousness and inadequate knowledge regarding the disruptions. This criticism underscores the gravity of the situation and the need for a detailed and transparent explanation from the authorities.
As the situation develops, the LHC’s upcoming hearing will be crucial in determining the future of internet access in Pakistan and addressing the broader concerns about digital freedom and economic impact.
