Quetta: In a landmark decision, the Balochistan High Court has declared the provincial government’s decision to ban wheat purchases as illegal. The court ruled that the provincial cabinet’s decision to purchase wheat at a discounted rate did not meet the standards of rationality and prudent financial management.
Background and Court’s Ruling
The Balochistan High Court reviewed the provincial cabinet’s policy regarding the procurement of wheat and found it lacking in both rationality and sound financial judgment. The court emphasized that the decision failed to consider the broader implications for the province’s already strained financial resources.
Financial Reallocation and Recommendations
In a decisive move, the court directed the Chief Secretary of Balochistan to reallocate the 500 million rupees initially intended for wheat procurement. The court ordered these funds to be used for more critical needs, including the establishment of a technical center, town planning, and the provision of clean water supply.
The court underscored the necessity for the provincial government to prioritize its expenditures in light of the weak financial condition of the province. It called for a reduction in expenses and suggested the closure of loss-making departments to alleviate the economic burden on Balochistan.
Critique of the Food Department
The Balochistan High Court pointedly criticized the provincial food department, stating that it has failed to achieve its objectives. The court highlighted the redundancy of the food department’s role in the presence of the Pakistan Agricultural Storage and Services Corporation (PASCO). It described the department’s operations as a duplication of efforts, further straining the province’s finances.
Formation of a High-Level Committee
To address these issues, the court instructed the relevant authorities to establish a high-level committee. This committee is tasked with preparing recommendations for eliminating departments that place unnecessary financial burdens on the province. The objective is to streamline operations and ensure that public funds are utilized effectively and efficiently.
Directives to Provincial Leadership
The court also directed that a copy of its decision be sent to both the Chief Secretary and the Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister of Balochistan. The court expressed an expectation that the Chief Minister would personally review the matter, underscoring the importance of high-level oversight in implementing these changes.
Petitioner’s Challenge and Court’s Response
The court’s decision came in response to a petition filed by Imranullah and Muhammad Siddique, who challenged the provincial cabinet’s decision on wheat procurement. The two-member bench of the Balochistan High Court had previously reserved its decision on the matter, which has now culminated in this pivotal ruling.
Implications for Balochistan
The court’s ruling is expected to have significant implications for the governance and financial management of Balochistan. By redirecting funds towards essential services and infrastructure projects, the province can better address the needs of its citizens. Additionally, the call to streamline government departments and reduce wasteful expenditure could lead to more sustainable financial practices in the long term.
This decision also underscores the judiciary’s role in ensuring that government policies are both rational and financially sound. By holding the provincial government accountable, the Balochistan High Court is advocating for a more transparent and effective use of public resources.
The Balochistan High Court’s decision to declare the provincial government’s wheat ban illegal and its directive to reallocate funds marks a significant step towards improved financial management in the province. The emphasis on rational decision-making and prudent financial practices highlights the court’s commitment to ensuring that public funds are used efficiently and effectively. As Balochistan moves forward, these directives could pave the way for more sustainable and responsible governance.
