It seems like you’ve provided a detailed description of a situation involving statements made by the President of a country regarding a bill, alleged forgery, legal experts’ opinions, and the need for evidence and legal action. However, the text is quite lengthy and complex. Let me provide you with a summarized version in English:
In Islamabad and Karachi, according to news agencies and TV reports, legal experts have expressed concerns about the President’s recent statements regarding a bill. They believe that his comments have created confusion due to doubts about the authenticity of his signature on the bill. Barrister Ali Zafar stated that the Attorney General’s explanation was incorrect, as the bill hasn’t become a law yet.
Salman Akram Raja highlighted that the press conference by government officials clarified that the bill wasn’t sent back, raising questions about whether the President had indeed given his approval. The experts suggest that the President should demand an FIR against his team if he truly opposes their actions.
Furthermore, the President’s signature on an army act bill has raised suspicion. Analysts argue that if he hasn’t signed it, he should take legal action against his team for forgery. The situation has caused confusion and questions about the authenticity of the President’s statements.
Legal experts, including Ahmed Bilal Mehboob, Hameed Mir, Hafiz Ehsan Ahmed, Faisal Kareem Kundi of the People’s Party, and Irfran Siddiqui of PML-N, shared their opinions on this issue. They emphasized the need for clarity and evidence, suggesting that if forgery occurred, legal action should be taken.
The President’s assertion that he hadn’t signed the bill contradicts his initial tweet. It’s unclear whether the President will pursue legal action against his own team members or present the matter to the Supreme Court. The issue involves serious allegations, and experts have highlighted that the situation involves sensitive matters and individuals from various government departments.
In summary, the situation involves doubts about the President’s signature on a bill, alleged forgery, legal experts’ opinions, and the need for clear evidence and legal action. The President’s conflicting statements have led to confusion and skepticism about his intentions. Legal experts are emphasizing the need for concrete proof and a transparent legal process to address this matter effectively.
